Why the planned security package in Germany makes little sense

Why the planned security package in Germany makes little sense

In recent months, the German government has announced a new security package aimed at strengthening internal security and combating crime. At first glance, this may seem sensible, but a closer look reveals that this package offers few effective solutions and could even be counterproductive.

1. Focus on repression instead of prevention

The security package focuses heavily on repressive measures. Instead, the focus should be on preventive strategies that address the causes of crime. Social inequality, lack of education and lack of integration are often the roots of crime. An effective security package would therefore have to invest in education, social programs and integration. The failed asylum policy also plays a significant role here. Criminals who want to commit crimes are not deterred by bans.

2. Insufficient evidence base

Another point of criticism is the lack of evidence for the proposed measures. Many of the planned measures are not sufficiently supported by studies or data. In particular, the effectiveness of increased monitoring or stricter laws is often questionable. A security package should be based on clear scientific findings in order to actually achieve the desired effect.

3. Invasion of privacy

The planned surveillance and data storage measures raise serious questions about data protection and citizens' privacy. In a democracy, citizens' rights should not be restricted in favor of short-term security concerns. A balance between security and freedom is essential to maintain the population's trust in institutions. Current drafts will further restrict legal gun owners, who are already among the most monitored citizens. Criticism from experts is knowingly ignored here.

4. Ignoring local differences

Germany is a country with many different regions that have different security concerns and needs. A blanket security package ignores these differences and therefore cannot effectively address the specific challenges in individual cities or communities. Instead, a decentralized approach that takes local specificities into account would be much more effective.

5. Risk of stigmatization

The implementation of such security packages can lead to certain groups being stigmatized and criminalized. Instead of finding solutions together, this can further deepen societal divisions and undermine trust in state institutions. An effective security package should aim to include all citizens and promote a sense of community.

Conclusion

At first glance, the current security package in Germany appears to be a necessary response to rising crime rates and security concerns. However, a closer look reveals that in its current form it offers few meaningful solutions. Real progress in internal security requires a more comprehensive strategy that focuses on prevention, education and social justice. This is the only way to find a sustainable and fair approach to security in Germany.